Skip to content
(931) 591-3740
Clarksville, TN

StemWave therapy in Clarksville for sore muscles

A focused acoustic wave therapy we use alongside our other care for heel pain and other muscle and joint complaints. No needles and no injections, and it goes into a plan after we've examined you.

Back anatomical view of the skeleton, marked at: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand, low back, knee, plantar fascia
Shoulder · Elbow · Wrist and hand · Low back · Knee · Plantar fascia
The manufacturer's video about StemWave, in its own words, with clips of patients reacting to treatment (3 min 55 s, subtitled).

StemWave therapy uses a focused acoustic wave device: an applicator moved over the skin delivers pulses into the tissue underneath. We added it at our Clarksville practice in September 2026, and we use it alongside our other care for muscle and joint complaints.

How we use StemWave at Source Chiropractic

We use StemWave on the plantar fascia as one part of care for plantar fasciitis and heel pain. One of our chiropractors may also add it to a plan for muscle and joint complaints involving the:

It's one part of a plan, added after a history and an examination when it fits what we find. For pain running down the leg, our sciatica page covers the care we use.

What is a StemWave session like?

A session is short. We put gel on the skin over the area and move the applicator across it while the device delivers pulses. Nothing is injected, there are no needles, and no anesthetic is used. The number of sessions is decided after the exam and reviewed against your progress.

Is StemWave FDA approved?

StemWave is listed with the FDA as a Class I therapeutic massager, the lowest-risk of the FDA's three device classes, which is exempt from premarket review. A listing isn't FDA clearance or approval, and the manufacturer says so. Its listed use is the temporary relief of minor muscle aches and pains and a temporary increase in local blood circulation.

Is StemWave the same as shockwave therapy or SoftWave?

Its maker puts StemWave in the shockwave family. In the video above, the manufacturer explains that StemWave creates a spark in water, which sends acoustic waves into the tissue, and its chart of device types labels it "StemWave Shockwave" beside electromagnetic, piezoelectric and radial pressure shockwave. The comparisons in that video are the manufacturer's own.

SoftWave is a different company's device. SoftWave's listed general use is much like StemWave's, relief of minor muscle aches and pains and a temporary increase in local blood circulation, and SoftWave also has FDA clearance for certain wound and burn uses that we don't treat.

Does StemWave use stem cells?

No. Nothing is taken from your body and nothing is injected, so no stem cells are added, your own or anyone else's. The name makes people think of stem cell injections, but the manufacturer doesn't say the device makes stem cells, and neither do we. The idea that shock waves draw stem cells to an area comes from lab and animal studies, not from patients.

What the research on shockwave therapy shows

When we searched PubMed for StemWave by name in October 2026, we found no studies of it. Its maker places it in the shockwave family, and reviews of shockwave therapy, called extracorporeal shock wave therapy or ESWT in research, have found:

These trials used many different shockwave devices and doses, so they describe shockwave therapy as a kind of treatment rather than StemWave itself or how you'll respond.

Before your first session

We need to know if you're pregnant, take blood-thinning medication or have a bleeding disorder, have an implanted electronic device, or have had a steroid injection in the area recently. The same goes for numbness, an open wound or a skin condition where we'd be working. Sometimes the answer is that the device isn't right for you.

Side effects and other options

In a review of 39 plantar fasciitis studies with 2,493 patients, 225 reported pain during treatment and 247 short-lived redness of the skin afterwards. Brief pain afterwards, swelling, bruising and altered sensation were also reported, and there were two complications. The authors concluded shockwave therapy is likely safe for plantar fasciitis, though with follow-up averaging about 15 months, long-term effects aren't known. A Cochrane review of shoulder trials rated the evidence on side effects low quality and called safety uncertain. If anything bothers you during or after a session, tell us.

StemWave isn't the only option. Supportive shoes, insoles and stretching are first steps for heel pain, exercise and staying active are first steps for low back pain, and for a new rotator cuff problem, a large trial found a physiotherapist's advice session with home exercise did as well over a year as a longer supervised exercise program. We'll go over the options that fit you at your exam. We also use laser therapy and dry needling, and a licensed massage therapist works out of our office (massage therapy).

How much does StemWave cost?

The new-patient chiropractic offer has its own terms. For StemWave, ask the office what each session costs, how many sessions we expect, and when we'll review your progress.

Book a visit

If your heel, shoulder, back or another joint has been sore, a first visit is where we'd work out whether StemWave belongs in your plan. If we are not able to help you with your problem or are unable to reduce your pain levels, we will make sure to give you a recommendation to another experienced provider. Contact us to book.

Research, with context.

Selected published sources behind what we've written, each with what it found and what it can't tell us. We give you both halves because no paper can diagnose you or predict how your own care will go.

  1. Systematic review & meta-analysis 2025

    Extracorporeal shock wave therapy shows comparative results with other modalities for the management of plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    15 randomized trials, 1,123 patients with plantar fasciitis, comparing shock wave therapy with placebo and six other conservative treatments.

    What it foundShock wave therapy did better than placebo for pain and better than corticosteroid injection for function. Platelet-rich plasma injection did better than shock wave therapy for both, and custom orthotics improved function more than shock wave therapy; other comparisons showed no significant difference.

    What it can't tell usTrials published after 2013 only, with varied protocols and devices. The pooled result doesn't describe StemWave or any single device, and can't tell us which device or dose produced it.

    Publication details & citation

    Tung et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy shows comparative results with other modalities for the management of plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.11.005.

    Read the publication record
  2. Systematic review & network meta-analysis 2026

    Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with conventional physical therapy for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Randomized trials of adults with chronic low-back pain, comparing shock wave therapy, conventional physical therapy, the two combined, and sham; 14 reported pain and 8 reported function.

    What it foundThe combination of shock wave therapy and physical therapy ranked first for pain and function and did better than physical therapy alone. Shock wave therapy alone reduced pain more than sham but showed no significant effect on function.

    What it can't tell usThe authors call for more high-quality trials before the finding is settled. Devices and doses varied across the trials; the result doesn't describe StemWave or any single device.

    Publication details & citation

    Qiao et al. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with conventional physical therapy for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Frontiers in Physiology. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2026.1807929.

    Read the publication record
  3. Systematic review 2020

    Shock wave therapy for rotator cuff disease with or without calcification

    32 trials, 2,281 participants with rotator cuff disease, most with calcific deposits; the main comparison was shock wave therapy against placebo at three months.

    What it foundPain and function were slightly better with shock wave therapy than placebo, by less than the amount the authors considered clinically important. Adverse events were more frequent with treatment (41 of 156 versus 10 of 139 in five trials), with safety described as uncertain.

    What it can't tell usEvery trial was susceptible to bias and none measured quality of life. The devices were extracorporeal or radial shock wave systems at varied doses; the result doesn't describe StemWave or any single device, dose or protocol.

    Publication details & citation

    Surace et al. Shock wave therapy for rotator cuff disease with or without calcification. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008962.pub2.

    Read the publication record
  4. Systematic review 2017

    Complications of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in plantar fasciitis: Systematic review

    39 studies, 2,493 patients with plantar fasciitis, receiving roughly 6,400 shock wave treatment sessions across a wide range of energy settings.

    What it foundTwo complications were recorded in the whole series: precordial (chest) pain, and a superficial skin infection after regional anaesthesia. 225 patients reported pain during treatment and 247 reported transient red skin afterwards; transient pain, swelling, bruising, petechiae, altered sensation and severe headache were also reported.

    What it can't tell usThe authors conclude shock wave therapy is likely safe for plantar fasciitis, with no complications expected at one year. Follow-up averaged 14.7 months and they call long-term complications unknown. The devices and doses varied widely; the result describes shock wave therapy for one condition, not StemWave or any single device.

    Publication details & citation

    Roerdink et al. Complications of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in plantar fasciitis: Systematic review. International Journal of Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.587.

    Read the publication record

Our editorial policy explains how to read these sources and what our clinical-review labels mean.