Updated
Dry needling is the placement of a thin, solid filament needle into a taut band of muscle or a trigger point, with nothing injected. At Source Chiropractic it is performed by a chiropractic physician, and it is used as one part of a plan for muscular and soft-tissue findings, not as a treatment on its own. This guide covers what it is, what it feels like, its risks, and what the evidence does and does not support.
Is dry needling the same as acupuncture?
No. The needle is similar, and the two are often confused for that reason. Acupuncture is a distinct practice with its own theory and training; in Tennessee a chiropractic physician may practice it only after 250 hours of accredited acupuncture education, a national examination and a letter from the Board (Rule 0260-02-.02(4)). Dry needling is a musculoskeletal technique: the target is a specific muscle finding identified by examination, and the aim is a local response in that tissue. This page describes dry needling only. If you want acupuncture, ask, and we will tell you whether it is offered here and by whom.
Who may perform dry needling in Tennessee, and who does here?
Tennessee's rules for chiropractic physicians state that a chiropractic physician has the authority to utilize physical agent modalities and perform an adjustment, manipulation, manual therapy, dry needling, rehabilitation, or treatments to the human frame and soft tissues (Rule 0260-02-.02(2)(b)). At Source Chiropractic, dry needling is performed by a chiropractic physician. Ask the doctor about their dry needling training before your first session; that is a fair question and it has a specific answer.
What findings is it used for?
In the practice's own words, dry needling may be used to address appropriate muscular and soft-tissue components of a neuromusculoskeletal condition. In practice that means taut bands and trigger points found on examination in the neck, upper back and shoulder, the low back and hip, and the muscles that contribute to some headaches. The needle is aimed at a finding, not at a diagnosis. If the examination does not find a muscular component, there is nothing for a needle to do, and it is not offered.
What does a session feel like?
A thin, solid needle is inserted through the skin into the target muscle. Most people feel a brief pinch, then a deep ache or heaviness at the target, and sometimes a short involuntary twitch of the muscle; those are the responses the technique looks for. Needles are single-use and sterile, and are disposed of after the session. Soreness at the site for a day or two afterwards is common, and mild bruising can occur. A session is usually combined with other care in the same visit, such as an adjustment or exercise guidance, rather than given alone.
What are the risks?
Minor effects are common and expected. In a prospective survey of 7,629 treatments by trained physiotherapists, bruising, bleeding and pain during or after treatment were the common ones, and no significant event occurred. A 2026 systematic review of 59 studies found minor adverse events reported at rates from 0% to 48% of treatments, depending on the study and what was counted (see the research below).
Serious harm is uncommon but real. The same review found major adverse events reported in 0% to 0.43% of treatments, and case reports document pneumothorax, a punctured lung, after needling of muscles over the chest wall and around the shoulder blade. That risk is specific to needle placement near the lungs. It is the reason the technique, the angle and the depth matter. If chest pain or shortness of breath starts during or after a session, call 911 or go to an emergency department and tell them where the needles were placed. Do not wait to reach the practice.
Before the first session, tell the doctor if you take blood-thinning medication, have a bleeding disorder, an implanted device or a compromised immune system, are pregnant, or have a fear of needles. The doctor needs each of those before deciding whether dry needling is appropriate for you.
What does the research support?
Reviews of trials, mostly of dry needling performed by physical therapists, find that it can reduce pain and tenderness in the weeks after treatment compared with no treatment or sham needling, with the quality of that evidence rated very low to moderate. The same reviews find that it is not clearly better than other hands-on or exercise-based care, and that benefits beyond three months are uncertain. For low back pain with trigger points, dry needling combined with other treatment did better than dry needling alone. For chronic neck pain, it reduced pain but was not superior to physical or manual therapy for function.
Read that as a description of a modest, short-term tool that belongs inside a plan, not a promise about your result. The studies also involve a mix of techniques and clinician training, so a result from one trial does not describe every needle placed anywhere.
What other options should I consider?
For a muscular finding, the alternatives are the rest of the plan: exercise and loading, massage therapy for hands-on soft-tissue work by a licensed therapist, manual therapy and adjustment where a joint finding is part of the picture, and time, since many muscular complaints settle. NICE's low back pain recommendations put activity and exercise first. Medical care and physical therapy answer different needs. A persistent muscular complaint that does not fit the examination findings is a reason to look again, not to needle harder.
What should I ask before booking?
- What finding are we treating, and how will we know it has changed?
- What training do you have in dry needling, and how often do you perform it?
- Why needle this rather than treat it by hand, or with exercise alone?
- What will I feel, and what should make me stop you?
- What does each session cost, and when will we review progress?
If we are not able to help you with your problem or are unable to reduce your pain levels, we will make sure to give you a recommendation to another experienced provider.
Contact the team to discuss availability and fees. The new-patient chiropractic offer has its own terms; ask about the cost of additional services before agreeing to them.
Follow the evidence
Research, with context.
Published sources behind the discussion. Read the findings alongside the limits; a study is not a diagnosis or a promise of a result.
The Effectiveness of Trigger Point Dry Needling for Musculoskeletal Conditions by Physical Therapists: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
13 randomized trials of dry needling performed by physical therapists for musculoskeletal pain, compared with sham, no treatment or another intervention.
What it foundIn the immediate to 12-week period, dry needling may reduce pain and raise pressure pain threshold compared with sham or no treatment. At 6 to 12 months the difference was not statistically significant, and it was not superior to other treatments for function.
What it cannot tell usEvidence was rated very low to moderate quality. The trials were of physical therapists using mixed techniques across mixed conditions; the result does not describe every needle placed by every clinician.
Publication details & citation
Gattie et al. The Effectiveness of Trigger Point Dry Needling for Musculoskeletal Conditions by Physical Therapists: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2017. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7096.
Read the publication recordEvidence for Dry Needling in the Management of Myofascial Trigger Points Associated With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
11 randomized trials, 802 patients with low-back pain and myofascial trigger points.
What it foundDry needling of trigger points reduced pain intensity and disability more than other treatments immediately after treatment, and dry needling plus other treatment did better for pain than dry needling alone.
What it cannot tell usModerate evidence for the post-treatment effect only. The authors called the superiority for disability, and the effects at follow-up, unclear.
Publication details & citation
Liu et al. Evidence for Dry Needling in the Management of Myofascial Trigger Points Associated With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.008.
Read the publication recordEffects of dry needling on functioning and pain relief in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Five randomized trials of adults with chronic nonspecific neck pain, comparing dry needling, alone or added to physiotherapy, with sham, physical therapy or nothing.
What it foundDry needling reduced pain more than the comparison groups, but was not significantly better for function on the Neck Disability Index.
What it cannot tell usFive trials only, and the authors call for further high-quality studies. It does not show dry needling is better than manual or physical therapy for function.
Publication details & citation
de Sire et al. Effects of dry needling on functioning and pain relief in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2026. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2025.2529423.
Read the publication recordAdverse events following trigger point dry needling: a prospective survey of chartered physiotherapists
39 physiotherapists in Ireland trained in trigger point dry needling, recording 7,629 treatments over ten months.
What it foundMild adverse events followed 19% of treatments: bruising (7.6%), bleeding (4.7%), pain during treatment (3.0%) and pain afterwards (2.2%) were the common ones. No significant adverse event occurred, giving an estimated upper risk of 0.04% or less.
What it cannot tell usOne training lineage, one country, and clinicians reporting on themselves. A survey that records no serious event over 7,629 treatments bounds the risk; it does not show the risk is zero, and case reports elsewhere document serious harm.
Publication details & citation
Brady et al. Adverse events following trigger point dry needling: a prospective survey of chartered physiotherapists. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2014. DOI: 10.1179/2042618613Y.0000000044.
Read the publication recordFrequency and severity of adverse events associated with dry needling: a systematic review and meta-analysis
59 studies: case reports and series, surveys of 2,380 professionals, and trials and observational studies covering 1,947 patients.
What it foundMinor adverse events were common, reported in 0% to 48% of treatments depending on the study. Major adverse events were uncommon per treatment (0% to 0.43%) but were reported by a meaningful share of clinicians over a whole career.
What it cannot tell usWhat counted as an event, and how it was reported, differed widely between studies. The rates describe the literature as a whole, not any one clinician, technique or body region.
Publication details & citation
Rabanal-Rodríguez et al. Frequency and severity of adverse events associated with dry needling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physical Therapy. 2026. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzag050.
Read the publication recordPneumothorax as a complication of dry needling technique
Four patients treated for pneumothorax after dry needling of the shoulder or neck region at one Belgian university hospital over 15 months.
What it foundThe authors conclude that pneumothorax after dry needling is not extremely rare, and that consent should name it as a considerable risk for needling in the neck, shoulder or chest region.
What it cannot tell usA case series establishes that a harm can happen, not how often. Frequency estimates come from the systematic review of adverse events, not from this series.
Publication details & citation
Bontinck et al. Pneumothorax as a complication of dry needling technique. ERJ Open Research. 2024. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00156-2024.
Read the publication record
Read our editorial policy for how sources and clinical review are identified.